Zionism was not created in Britian. It was created in mainland Europe, by a group of atheist Jews. That said, while Britain may not have founded Zionism, it certainly has to take some responsibility for
accomodating and faciltating it, by way of the Balfour agreement.
Contrary to popular belief, Lord Balfour did not agree to do this, because he was empathetic about Jews. On the contrary, Lord Balfour hated Jews, or more accurately, he did not like what he saw as typical behaviour in large gatherings of Jews in Britain.
Don't believe me about Lord Balfour and Jews, go look yourself. I am going to offer you no link, people will only say it is not a 'good' source, so find a link that suits you, about it.
Truth be told, he was relieved, he thought that Jews in Britain would leave. For this new 'homeland'. They didn't. Maybe some did.
For the British, they also believed it would be handy to have an outpost there, in the Middle East, populated by immigrant Jews they believed would be loyal to them, in some sense.
Big mistake, the Zionist does not know the meaning of loyalty, and in his world of anti virtues, loyalty is merely something to be exploited.
There is evidence of that all around.
Britain's pay back for making it possible for this 'Jewish state' to locate to where it did, was to be targets of Jew terror groups, like Irgun and the Stern Gang, who bombed buldings, and killed civilians. They were the blueprint for all modern terrorism.
In all truth, what they did to the King David Hotel should have been seen as an act of war in itself, and the experiment aborted right there and then.
But no, for whatever reason, we did not squash the seeds of terrorism when we could, and now look what we have?
On one side of a wall, we have a state that have killed more civilians that Hamas. One that has routinely ignored the Geneva Convention, the UN and International Law. And on the other side? Naturally, you have the inevitable violent opposition.
Israeli operatives have done a good job convincing Americans that American interests are Israeli interests.
Believe me, do some reading, and you will see yourself that they are NOT.
However, I consider Israel to be such a rogue state, so far removed from anything approaching trustworthy enough to hold nukes, and so much of a problem to peace, that they must be made to abide by international laws, remove the blockades, remove all the illegal settlements, end the aburd permit system and check points, and give full co-operation to have what nukes it has inspected.
When the German Reich grew so heady on power, that IT disregarded human rights, and international treaties, many nations did roll over, and accept their new masters.
No resistance in Belgium to speak of, or Holland, and the so called 'French Resistance' comprised mainly of some people buying the newspaper of the 'resistance', but really that was about it, many French had accepted their new masters, and were okay about it.
Leaving the German/Russia thing aside for now, it was always Britain that Hitler knew would be the tough nut to crack.
Why do you think Hitler wanted peace with Britian? He had only respect for our heritage, our spirit, and, to be honest, the fact that we are an island nation with a good military.
While other nations in Europe meekly lay down, Britain did not, and toward the end, they were joined by America, which was enough to tilt any last hopes of a Reich victory.
Since this was partly Britians doing, how things have played out in Israel, I believe that Britian has a special responsibility to demand that Israel comply with all international law, Geneva convetion, etc.
Take the lead, and lobby the other nations in the EU to support the morally correct stance.
If Israel is the civlised state that it tells us, then they will negotitate and follow the demand for international law compliance, and nuke weapon inspection.
If they did that, good stuff, one huge stride made.
One that would actually improve Israel's image, and the peace in the region.
Failure to comply would lead on a Gov led boycott of all Israel goods, investements, etc, in the European nations of the willing.
If sanctions are good enough for other countries, then they are good enough for Israel.
Germany woud get up off it's knees, stop it's taught self hating, and cease to plough any more cash into Israel.
Discussion, demand to obey law, demand to undo that which is illegal, threat of sanctions, all of those things are perfectly legit, to pressure a rogue state into better observance.
There would be no question of it getting to a military option.
Look, forget the myth about the IDF, and how powerful the Israeli army are.
They really aren't. Why do you think they need Americans and Brits to do the real fighting?
I grant you, they are good at shooting dead unarmed civilians, and they are pretty hot at dropping chemical onto kids to burn them, but when it comes to troops on the ground fighting, no, they avoid this at all costs, because they cannot fight real armies.
Or even crap one's, as Hezbollah were to demonstrate, just a few years ago. Israel put troops on the ground. They got pumped.
So, please, let us not hear that Israel could stand up to Britian let alone a Britain supported, in a military sense!
Even if cuts have scaled our investment back, it would still be MORE than enough, WAY more, to flick Israel and the IDF into space.
And for all that some fake Americans may come on here and claim that the US would 'help Israel'....are you sure?
Israel costs the US money, and many Americans are smart enough to realise that Britain and Europe make better allies and trading partners, now and in the future.
Do you REALLY think that the US would save you this time?
It is boldness and honest that we need back in our politics.
And there would be no more bold an action or more honest a gesture, than to demand Israel behave within the boundaries of law.
Jack
actuary elon musk anderson cooper al sharpton fox mole manson bubba watson
Micro and Macro Community Geo-Targeting at Vans